By 1927, Ford Motor Car Co had sold 15 million Model T Fords world-wide- nothing to see here. Historically, we didn't start producing higher CO2 levels till the late 1950's and 60's when mass car production kicked in.
Today, there are circa 1.5 billion cars on the road- given peek production from the 1990's till now. That's higher CO2 production occurring only in the last 50-60 years!
NASA records peg 1950 CO2 levels at 300 parts per million. For millennia, atmospheric carbon dioxide had never been above this level. So, everything up until 1950 was within normal operating parameters. Currently, it's floating around 420 parts per million. One can safely conclude, It's only from 1950/60 till now that excess man-made CO2 has become a 'thing'.
If CO2 was the actual cause of climate change, why did the planets temperature start rising a good half century or more prior to CO2 levels rising? This 'theory' simply doesn't mesh with the Milankovitch Cycles.
Looking back to forgone civilisations, they too perished on-mass, where was their excess CO2? There wasn't any! It was too much negative energy like the 'current version' of humanity is blindly building... again.
The CO2 argument that its the sole, or even main driver of climate change is ultimately flawed! It has a death-knell circa-60 year hole in it. And, the fact that it has never been scientifically shown to be the case, smacks of poorly crafted gaslighting!
The official rational provided by authorities is hyped BS at best! CO2 may well exacerbate the underlying condition, but it's not the cause.
To keep things in perspective, atmospheric CO2 in 1950 was 0.03% and now it's 0.04%. Trees need it to grow. The CO2 story we've been fed is loaded with another virus, just like the last virus BS, and the BS before that...
No doubt, our overall health would improve if we reduced our emissions. The less forever-chem's we breathe in the better, right! Tragically, the technology to go clean and free exists, it's just naively been kept from us.
If mankind cannot see beyond the deceitfully guided, narrow-mindedly embellished, barking-up-the-wrong-tree narrative and consider all possibilities, then another planetary reset may well be imminent. In-part or all-of life, who knows?
If you regard yourself to be open minded, I implore you to dig deeper and look at the evidence- free of bias. If you can manage that, then step back and take another look at the world.
Our very future depends on humanity understanding and coming to terms with the life-forces we are governed by. Generating too much negative energy triggers demise and sparks yet another iteration of life.
It's us, that's put us in the firing line, and it's only us, that can save us!
----------------
Do your own due diligence, but below are reference links to videos and web pages that highlight some of the claims stated in this post, or is in some way associated with the subject matter.
Ref links:
Climate Change Experts STUMPED By A Simple Question
The True Cost Of Mining Electric Car Battery Metals
Watch Scientist Destroy Bill Maher’s Narrative w/ Facts in Under 1 Minute
Renewable Energy's Biggest Challenge - Daniel Yergin
Still a lot of knuckle dragging going on out there. With 0.04% CO2 in the actual atmosphere, how much CO2 do they want to store, of which, luckily it's impossible to do... phew.
© 2026 Tune in to love life - Policies
